Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Wesley Arlt, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1994No. 92-50467, 92-50517PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

BACKGROUND

Charley Wesley Arlt was convicted of conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine and money laundering. He appeals his conviction on various grounds. Here we address only Arlt’s self-representation claim. In a memorandum disposition accompanying this opinion, we deal with Arlt’s other claims, as well as those of his codefendants.

During a pretrial hearing, Arlt requested that he be permitted to represent himself at trial. After the district judge extensively discussed the disadvantages of self-representation, Arlt repeated his request. Before ruling on the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. United States v. Sean Lamont CromerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API