Legal Opinion

State v. Sailas

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1996No. 21905PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal requires that we determine whether there existed circumstances that justified police officers’ warrantless entry into the defendant’s apartment when the police responded to a call regarding a domestic disturbance. We conclude that the “exigent circumstances” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement applies here. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence acquired by police following their entry,

FACTS

Joel Sailas was charged with possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, I.C. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. MitzelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BowerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. ButerbaughIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. ReynoldsIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API