Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ubiles v. People

Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided May 25, 2017No. S. Ct. Criminal No. 2014-0084Published

1ConcurrenceHodge, Chief Justice

I agree with the majority that the People introduced sufficient evidence to sustain Ubiles’s convictions. I write separately because I would reach the merits of Ubiles’s Confrontation Clause challenge, but conclude that his constitutional rights were not violated when the People failed to call Lt. Jarvis as a witness.

I. WAIVER

As a threshold matter, it is well-established that waiver is a non-jurisdictional, judicially-created doctrine, and thus an appellate court may “exercise[ ] its discretion to bypass [a] relatively complex waiver issue and resolve [the] appeal on the merits” if the issue…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Jackie Presser Harold Friedman and Anthony HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API