Ubiles v. People
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
1ConcurrenceHodge, Chief Justice
I agree with the majority that the People introduced sufficient evidence to sustain Ubiles’s convictions. I write separately because I would reach the merits of Ubiles’s Confrontation Clause challenge, but conclude that his constitutional rights were not violated when the People failed to call Lt. Jarvis as a witness.
I. WAIVER
As a threshold matter, it is well-established that waiver is a non-jurisdictional, judicially-created doctrine, and thus an appellate court may “exercise[ ] its discretion to bypass [a] relatively complex waiver issue and resolve [the] appeal on the merits” if the issue…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Jackie Presser Harold Friedman and Anthony HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.