Shapiro v. Weissman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property in which the defense is usury, the appeal is from an order granting a motion for summary judgment striking out appellants’ answer (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. The affidavits submitted on *753the motion present an issue of fact as to whether the loan was made to a corporation and guaranteed by appellants, in which event appellants would be precluded from pleading usury as a defense (General Business Law, § 374; Salvin v. Myles Realty Co., 227 N. Y. 51, 58), or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Salvin v. . Myles Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Pink v. L. Kaplan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by7 opinions
- Buoninfante v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Kaye v. KeretAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- PAC Construction Co. v. New York Factors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
- Schneider v. PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- A.S.A.P. Funding Corp. v. FarielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.