Legal Opinion

Shapiro v. Weissman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property in which the defense is usury, the appeal is from an order granting a motion for summary judgment striking out appellants’ answer (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. The affidavits submitted on *753the motion present an issue of fact as to whether the loan was made to a corporation and guaranteed by appellants, in which event appellants would be precluded from pleading usury as a defense (General Business Law, § 374; Salvin v. Myles Realty Co., 227 N. Y. 51, 58), or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Salvin v. . Myles Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Pink v. L. Kaplan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Buoninfante v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Kaye v. KeretAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. PAC Construction Co. v. New York Factors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Schneider v. PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. A.S.A.P. Funding Corp. v. FarielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API