Legal Opinion
Gudmundson v. Cardillo
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 16, 1942No. 7851PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGroner, C. J.
The case is here under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the District of Columbia. The injury was sustained in Bethesda, Maryland,- on thé 25th of May, 1939. Claim for compensation was made under the Maryland law. An award followed, and the statutory payments began the 29th of May, 1939. On the 4th of March, 1940, appellant (injured) having, perhaps, in the meantime ascertained the more liberal provision of the District of Columbia Act, filed a claim for compensation under that law. There was a hearing before the deputy commissioner May 2, 1940, to determine whether there was jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Neild v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Hillen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Matter of Dale v. . Saunders Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Gary E. Jones, United States of America v. Robert BryantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Central Labor CouncilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- John Doe v. John L. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Ronald L. Hall and Laura Hall v. C & P Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Coates v. Potomac Electric Power Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.