Texas a & M University at Corpus Christi v. Hamann

OPINION

SEERDEN, Chief Justice.

This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 1 By two issues, appellant, Texas A & M University at Corpus Christi (“A & M”), alleges the trial court erred by denying the motion because appellee’s claim was not brought within the statutory time period. We affirm.

Appellee, Dotti Hamann, alleges that she was employed by A & M as a Budget Monitor-Faculty Secretary between February and August 1994. In this position, Hamann was at least partially responsible for budgetary oversight within A & M’s…