Legal Opinion

Rowden v. Amick

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 9, 1968No. 53289PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

This is an action for damages for libel, in which there was a jury verdict for plaintiff for $300 actual and $1,000 punitive damages.

Defendant filed a posttrial motion to set aside the verdict and judgment for plaintiff and to enter judgment in accordance with defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, on these grounds:

“1. Plaintiff was a public official and the allegedly libelous statements related solely to the manner in which plaintiff performed his duties as a public official. Accordingly, thé doctrine of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Layson v. Jackson CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. State v. PowersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Williamson v. County Court of Barry CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Witt v. City of Webster GrovesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HornbeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  2. Bowman v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Rowden v. AmickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Cabinet for Health & Family v. J.M.G.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. DemarcoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API