Legal Opinion

Witt v. City of Webster Groves

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 9, 1964No. 50306PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Commissioner.

Appellants, Daniel W. Witt, et al., brought a class action against respondents, City of Webster Groves and its officers, seeking injunction and declaratory judgment by which to invalidate an annexation accomplished by respondent, City of Webster Groves. St. Louis County and its Supervisor intervened as plaintiffs by separate petition praying for a declaration of the legal status of respondents’ annexation ordinance and election. At the conclusion of plaintiffs’ and intervenors’ cases, the trial court sustained respondents’ motion for judgment denying the relief sought hy…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooper County Bank v. Bank of BuncetonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. Johnson County v. BrysonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. State Ex Rel. Tadlock v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Williamson v. County Court of Barry CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. State ex rel. Town of Olivette v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, (Consolidated with)Wanda Mayes v. Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. County of CamdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Desloge v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. Chance v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Rowden v. AmickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API