Bomsta v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Proceedings in the district court to establish Judicial Ditch No. 8 in Kandiyohi county. Andy H. Bomsta and others filed objections to the establishment of the ditch. Prom an order, Qvale, J., overruling his objections to the jurisdiction of the court to establish the proposed ditch, Andy H. Bomsta appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Under proceedings begun in 1908, Judicial Ditch No. 1 in the coun*166ties of Kandiyohi and Meeker was duly established and constructed, and the cost thereof was duly assessed against the property benefited thereby. The proceedings here in question were instituted to establish and construct a judicial ditch, in those counties, designated as Judicial Ditch No. 8; and, “by construction of the proposed ditch No. 8 which is laid over the course of said ditch No. 1, and which extends about two miles beyond the terminus thereof, it is proposed to greatly enlarge, widen and deepen the main…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sache v. WallaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Meranda v. SpurlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Malmsted v. Minneapolis Aerie, No. 34Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Hauschild v. RothIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- County of Ramsey v. SteesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- Larson v. Freeborn CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Board of Water Commissioners v. Roselawn CemeterySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Richardson County v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1925
- Lee v. County of JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Johnson v. HedtkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.