Legal Opinion

Richardson County v. Drainage District No. 1

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1925No. 24305PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, District Judge.

The thing in controversy is a fourth supplemental assessment for a contemplated improvement to Drainage District No. 1, of Richardson county, Nebraska. The ditch is under the drainage act, sections 1744-1812, Comp. St. 1922. The county was assessed $2,396.61 for its roads lying within the district, and other owners proportionately for their lands situate therein.

At the meeting of the supervisors of the district to hear complaints, the county objected that the proposed improvement was not a repair or improvement at all, but a new ditch, and wholly unauthorized; also,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hanscom v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Yeomans v. RiddleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Drainage District No. 1 v. Richardson CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Smith v. Monona-Harrison Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Omaha & North Platte Railroad v. Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mooney v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Ritter v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. McGree v. STANTON-PILGER DRAINAGE DISTRICTNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Mooney v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Engles v. Drainage District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API