Legal Opinion

Prohaska v. Hemmer-Miller Development Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 11, 1930No. Gen. No. 33,703PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley

In an action in assumpsit, commenced September-17, 1928, against The Hemmer-Miller Development Company (a South Dakota corporation), John G. Hemmer, its president, and Kirk S. Miller, its treasurer, the company and Hemmer were served with process, but Miller was not served. The company had an office at 35 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, and plaintiff, a resident of Chicago, sought to recover, by virtue of the provisions of section 37 and other sections, of the Illinois Securities Law (Cahill’s St. 1923, ch. 32, ¶ 290, p. 926), certain moneys which he had paid to the company, in accordance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Gopher Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. State v. WhiteakerOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Vercellini v. U. S. I. Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Kerst v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Blackwell v. BentsenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API