Legal Opinion

Root v. Kakadelis

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 3, 1965No. File No. CV 3-625-1295PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDearington, J.

The plaintiffs entered into a building contract with the named defendant, herein referred to as the defendant, to construct a dwelling *285house. In this action the plaintiffs sought to recover damages for alleged unskilful and unworkmanlike work in and about the dwelling and resultant damage to personal property. The plaintiffs also claimed that the real estate had been encumbered by two mechanics’ liens. The defendant answered by a general denial and a counterclaim for an alleged balance due. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs, both on the complaint and on the counterclaim, against the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. Pecos Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Misisco v. La MaitaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Stoll v. Almon C. Judd Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Graham v. HoulihanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. Stanley v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clavette v. KaminskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1970
  2. Pisacich v. Burns, No. 51 25 11 (May 16, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API