Legal Opinion

Bingham County v. First Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1903No. 889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Idaho.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The defendant in error was the plaintiff in the court below in an action against Bingham county, a municipal corporation of the state of Idaho, to recover a money judgment for the principal and interest alleged to be due on certain warrants theretofore drawn on the general fund of the county, and of which the plaintiff alleged it was the owner. The complaint, as amended, set out the number, date, and amount of each of the warrants sued on, to whom issued, on what fund drawn, the date each was presented to the treasurer of the county for payment, and the fact and date of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Prescott v. GonserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  3. McCormick v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Linden v. CaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Carroll v. SiebenthalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re FarrellMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McNutt v. Lemhi CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Attorneys for George Rikos v. Domi Publications, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API