Legal Opinion

Hodges & Dejarnette v. Thornton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 17, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sims, J.,

after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court.

The questions presented by the assignments of error will be disposed of in their order as stated below.

1. Was the occupancy of the lands involved in the instant case, that is, the possession (which means the right to the possession), undivided, so that neither the plaintiffs nor defendants know their part in severalty?

The question must be answered-in the negative; from which it follows that the parties are- tenants in *117common and the bill for partition was good upon the demurrer.

As said in 1 Minor or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griswold v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824
  2. Dohoney v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
  3. Schenk v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Bradshaw v. BoothSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Johnson v. MundySupreme Court of Virginia · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ames v. American National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Chappell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  3. Colvin v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  4. Murray v. PriceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Buchanan Coal Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API