James v. Powell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.
Plaintiff sued four defendants: Adam and Yvette Powell, and Gonzalo and Carmen Diago. The first canse of action is against defendants Powell only. It is that canse of action which is the subject of the motion to dismiss.
*2The allegations of this canse of action are that plaintiff obtained a judgment against defendant .Adam Powell in the .sum of $46,739.35, which judgment is unsatisfied except to the extent of $1,557.32; that at the time of the entry of judgment said defendant owned real estate in Puerto Rico of a value in excess of the amount of the judgment; and that thereafter, through the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Findlay v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Collins v. CroninSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. SpearenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
- Braem v. Merchants' National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marine Midland Bank v. MurkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- McElhanon v. HingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Strachman v. Palestinian AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Priestley v. Panmedix Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Coventry Group, Inc. v. GottliebOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.