Legal Opinion
Steck v. Home Indemnity Company
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1964No. 7398PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. M. SCARBOROUGH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, George P. Steck and wife, entered into a contract with Wilkerson Construction Company for the construction of a house for the plaintiffs. The contract contained this provision:
“Payments to be made on request as the work progresses to the value of ninety per cent (90%) of all work completed. The entire amount of contract to be paid within ten (10) days after completion.”
The Home Indemnity Company, as surety for Wilkerson, bound itself to the plaintiffs to guarantee performance by Wilkerson of its construction contract with the Stecks. The surety…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- William Edward Roucher v. Traders & General Insurance Company, Dallas, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Chan Wing Cheung A/K/A Bill Woo v. James A. Hamilton, Jr., District Director, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
- State of Maryland Ex Rel. Barresi v. HatchDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
- Lyons v. KitchellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Honolulu Roofing Co. v. FelixHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Moya v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Moya v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965