Domson, Inc. v. Kadrmas Lee & Jackson, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
KERN, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part).
*407[¶38.] I join issues 1 and 2 of the majority opinion but dissent on issue 3 wherein the majority affirms the grant of summary judgment on Domson's claim of negligent design. Domson established genuine issues of fact sufficient to require a jury to determine whether Dakota Engineering/KLJ breached the standard of care and caused Domson damages due to negligence in designing the project plans.
[¶39.] Summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pierce v. Ford Motor Co. Mahone v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Bordeaux v. Shannon County SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State Auto Insurance Companies v. B.N.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Stern Oil Co. v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.