Franzen v. Dimock Gould & Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentOliver, J.
(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent, and would hold the evidence insufficient to support a finding of liability on the part of appellant for damages or indemnity stemming from plaintiff’s injuries.
I. Appellant, Dimock Gould & Company, was- in the lumber and building material business at Bettendorf. The driveway across the concrete sidewalk, upon which plaintiff fell, served as an entrance to its lumberyard and also to a parking lot furnished by appellant for its customers but used regularly by its employees and also, without its actual permission or objection, used frequently by some…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Clarke v. HubbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Abar v. Ramsey Motor Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Calder v. SmalleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- City of Ottumwa v. ParksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Bamberg v. Bryan's Wet Wash Laundry Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.