Legal Opinion

Calder v. Smalley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 2, 1885PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Muscatine District Court. Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff by falling into a scuttle-bole constructed by defendant in a side-walk of a street upon which a building owned by him was erected. A judgment was rendered upon a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, Ch. J.

J. The petition alleges that defendant owns a certain house and lot, situated upon Second street, in the city of Muscatine; that the cellar under the house extends into the street, under the side-walk, in which defendant made a scuttle-liole to be used for putting wood in the cellar; that the covering of the hole was negligently constructed, being laid down without fastenings, upon planks which were not nailed; that plaintiff, while passing upon the sidewalk over the cellar, without fanlt or negligence upon her part, stepped upon the covering of the scuttle-hole, which gave way,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Congreve v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. City of Keokuk v. Independent DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Commonwealth v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Whalen v. ShivekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Franzen v. Dimock Gould & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Eisentrager v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  5. Baltimore Transit Co. v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API