Crowley's Milk Co. Inc. v. Brannan, Secretary of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
It is now no secret that governmental regulation of the distribution of milk is complex and mystifying. Even so, this case appears to set a record of its own. For the question of classification for the purpose of payment of the milk product here in issue, at first 'blush apparently simple, has baffled even the experts and the trade for several years. The milk product, as manufactured by plaintiff at its Binghamton plant during the period involved, 1943-1948, was a “mix” of whole milk, cream, skimmed milk solids, sugar and a stabilizer, all of which were homogenized. There…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Aerated Products Co. of Buffalo, Inc. v. GodfreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Waddington Milk Co. v. WickardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Kass v. Brannan, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Dairymen's League Cooperative Ass'n v. BrannanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stoliaroff v. RibicoffDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1961
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- General Ice Cream Corp. v. BensonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1953
- United States v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative FarmersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Fitchett Bros. v. FreemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.