Legal Opinion

State v. Mundy-Geidd

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 2014No. 27104PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Nicole Mundy-Geidd was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) in 2013. She appeals, arguing that enforcement of the DUI statute (SDCL 32-23-1) was prohibited at the time of her offense. She contends that until its repeal in 2014, SDCL 34-20A-93 prohibited the enforcement of laws, such as SDCL 32-23-1 that included “drinking, drunkenness, or being found in an intoxicated condition” as an element of the offense. We disagree and affirm the conviction.

Facts and Procedural History

[¶ 2.] In 2013, Mundy-Geidd was arrested and charged with DUI, in violation…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. National Amusement Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BryantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Siddock v. Upton, Bradeen & James, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
  3. Goin v. HoudasheltSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Orthopedic Institute v. Sanford Health Plan, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API