People v. Barkan
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leighton
This is an appeal from an order that sustained a motion by the State and dismissed a supplemental post-conviction petition filed by appellant Jerome Barkan. The issue to be resolved is whether the petition alleged facts which entitled the petitioner to an evidentiary hearing.1 The State’s motion admitted as true all the well-pleaded facts. Therefore, we must examine the petition in order to determine if it made a substantial showing that petitioner’s constitutional rights were violated at his trial. Our examination discloses the following allegations.
Petitioner is a prisoner in the Illinois…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. KrantzIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. GoergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- The PEOPLE v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- The PEOPLE v. SpicerIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- The PEOPLE v. OrndoffIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. FarleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- State v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1976