Federal Express Corp. v. Abeyta
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Chief Judge.
{1} This case involves the distinction between a taxpayer asserting error in the valuation of property and a taxpayer asserting error in the computation of taxes. In the former case, protests must be filed within sixty days, while in the latter case, there is no time limit specified and the general four-year statute of limitations applies. We hold that when a taxpayer makes computational errors in documents submitted to enable the taxing authorities to determine valuation, it is a case of error in valuation, and not computation, and therefore the sixty-day limit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Security Escrow Corp. v. State of Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nowlin v. County of BernalilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by10 opinions
- Campos v. BravoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Comer v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- State v. ComitzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2019
- Leigh v. Village of Los LunasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- A&W Rests., Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue Dep't of N.M.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.