Legal Opinion

Leigh v. Village of Los Lunas

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 2004No. 23,674, 23,731PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CASTILLO, Judge.

{1} In this ease, we are asked to decide if restrictive covenants are considered property for purposes of eminent domain. Specifically, the question before this Court is whether Defendant Village of Los Lunas (Village) must compensate Plaintiffs Mondy Leigh and Sylvia Leigh (Leighs), owners of Tract 2 in a subdivision, based on the Village’s construction of a drainage pond on Tract 1 in violation of the restrictive covenants imposed on both properties. The Village additionally argues that the district court erred by admitting an appraiser’s report and challenges the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Montoya v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Town of Stamford v. VuonoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Board of County Com'rs, Lincoln County v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Board of Public Instruction v. Town of Bay Harbor I.Supreme Court of Florida · 1955

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. SchoellkopfNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Castillo v. City of Las VegasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Agua Fria Save the Open Space Ass'n v. RoweNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. City of Steamboat Springs v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API