Nantz v. State

ON REHEARING.

April 25, 1923.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, in his motion for rehearing, directs attention to the fact that certain bills of exceptions relating to the action of the court in forcing him to try his case before certain jurors were not discussed. The still with which the State claims the liquor in question was manufactured by the appellant was pointed out to the juror and examined by him. A num ber of persons told him the purported facts and the appellant’s connection therewith. The juror was unable to state whether the persons to whom he had talked were witnesses or not. He…