Quinn v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of adultery, and her punishment assessed at a fine of $500; and prosecutes this appeal.
Appellant excepted to the action of the court in impaneling the jury. It seems that two of the jurors entertained an opinion which on direct examination they stated it would take evidence to remove before they could reach a verdict; one of them stated he had formed his opinion from having talked with one of the witnesses. Appellant exhausted her challenges and was compelled to take these jurors.' Both of these jurors stated that they believed they could try the case…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trotter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Dickson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
- Obenchain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
3Cited by15 opinions
- Messenger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Cordill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Hafley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.