Legal Opinion

Figert v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1997No. 50A03-9612-CR-446PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARRARD, Judge.

Teresa D. Figert and Byron Green bring this interlocutory appeal challenging the denial of their motion to suppress. Figert and Green contend that a warrant authorizing the search of their trailer was defective for want of probable cause.

We affirm.

The facts relevant to this appeal are contained in the probable cause affidavit which resulted in the search warrant for Figert’s and Green’s trailer. Omitting formal parts, the affidavit is as follows:

2. On Wednesday, May 8,1996,1 spoke with Confidential Informant 20-96. Confidential informant 20-96 advised that his neighbor…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Savannah Hinton, United States of America v. Susie Powers, Alias Susie PendletonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Figert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Figert v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Teresa Figert/B. Green v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API