Legal Opinion

Figert v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1997No. 50S03-9709-CR-473PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

In this interlocutory appeal, defendants Teresa D. Figert and Byron Green challenge the trial court’s denial of their motions to suppress. With one judge dissenting, the Court of Appeals affirmed. Figert v. State, 683 N.E.2d 1314 (Ind.Ct.App.1997). We granted transfer to address application of the “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule. We reverse the trial court.

Factual and Procedural History

As part of an ongoing undercover investigation, a police officer made several controlled purchases of crack cocaine from different men residing in, or at…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Shotts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Lundquist v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Sowers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Casady v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API