Legal Opinion
Marble VOIP Partners LLC v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 24, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02247Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARBLE VOIP PARTNERS LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-CV-2247-JAR-ADM ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Marble VOIP Partners LLC (“Marble”) filed this lawsuit under
35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a), (b), and (c), alleging that Defendant Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (“Zoom”) has directly and indirectly infringed on its patent. This matter is now before the Court on Zoom’s Motion to Dismiss Marble’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Doc. 29) on the grounds that (1) the claims…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Kansas Penn Gaming, LLC v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.