Muth v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The appellant maintains a produce yard containing thirteen tracks in the City of Pittsburgh. These tracks are in pairs with a space of about 24 feet on either side of each pair for vehicles to drive east and west for the purpose of loading and unloading cars. There is a crossing, 30 feet wide, running north and south over these tracks. A large amount of business is transacted daily in this yard as the produce is sold and delivered where the cars are spotted.
It appears under the plaintiffs ’ testimony that about 4:30 in the afternoon of March 12,1928, the A. B. Produce…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kay v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Robb v. Niles-Bement-Pond Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Thomas v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Frank v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- John v. Reick-Mcjunkin Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reid v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Lawrence J. Sabo, Administrator of the Estate of James Scott, Jr., Deceased v. Reading Company, (Bethayres Concrete Products Company, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957