Dunham v. Dunham
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
910 P.2d 169 (1994)
128 Idaho 55
Carl M. DUNHAM, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Roger S. DUNHAM and Belinda F. Dunham, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 20837.
Court of Appeals of Idaho.
November 29, 1994.
Rehearing Denied February 8, 1995.
David A. Frazier, Coeur d'Alene, argued, for appellant.
Prohaska Law Firm, Coeur d'Alene, for respondents. Thomas F. Prohaska, argued.
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
Carl Dunham appeals from a district court's judgment which held that a fraudulent transfer of real property did not occur between spouses. I.C. §§ 55-913 and 55-914. The court held that on the date the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Matter of Estate of LewisIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Boston Insurance Co. v. BeckettIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Whitehawk v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- Pennington v. BighamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.