Johnson v. May
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Strode, J. References: Fitch v. Waite, 5 Conn., 121; Winlcler v. Barthel, 6 111., Ill; Mathews v. Loth, 45 Mo.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Strode, J. References: Fitch v. Waite, 5 Conn., 121; Winlcler v. Barthel, 6 111., Ill; Mathews v. Loth, 45 Mo. App-, 155; Koch v. Losch, 31 Neb., 625; Rockioell v. Blair Savings Bank,. 31 Neb., 128; Bond v. Dolby, 17 Neb., 191; Keith v. Stetter, 25 Kan., 104; Baldtcin v. Flagg, 43 N. J. Law, 495; Hanson v. Graham, 82 Cal., 631; Haggart v. Morgan, 5 N. Y., 422; In re Thompson, 1 Wend. [N. Y.], 43; Frost v. Brisbin, 19 Wend. [N. Y.], 11; Garden v. Garden, 107 N. Car., 216; Olmstead v. Rivers, 9 Neb., 236; Blodgett v. Utley, 4…
1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.
In the district court for Lancaster county the plaintiff in error, Franklin E. Johnson, sued to recover the sum of $2,500 and interest, being the amount of two promissory notes of the defendants below, Eavid May and Tillie May, who are also defendants in error. At the commencement of said action an order of attachment was issued upon *603the filing by the plaintiff therein of a bond and an affidavit alleging as grounds for such attachment: (1) The defendants are non-residents of this state; (2) they have absconded with intent to defraud their creditors; (3) they have left the country of their…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keller v. CarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Chariton County v. MoberlySupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Mayer v. ZingreNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Lawson v. AdlardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Whipple v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- JR Watkins Company v. SorensonNebraska Supreme Court · 1958