Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only in Ohio Law Abstract

This case and that of Smith v. State were tried together in the Mayor’s Court, where Miller and Smith were convicted of selling and delivering intoxicating liquor to one eollins. Error was prosecuted by defendants, who contended that since the affidavits, on the filing of which the warrants were issued, were made by one Conrad who was dead and who had no *489personal knowledge of the facts therein stated. That the said Conrad would not be a competent witness and was not qualified or authorized by law to make the affidavits and that the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of South Euclid v. ClapacsSouth Euclid Municipal Court · 1966
  2. City of Willoughby v. HugebeckOhio Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API