Legal Opinion

Dentex Shoe Corp. v. F.E. Schmitz Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 1988No. 2-87-077-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARRIS, Justice.

Dentex Shoe Corporation petitions by writ of error attacking a default judgment taken against it by F.E. Schmitz Co., Inc. Because the jurisdiction of the trial court to grant the default judgment against petitioner affirmatively appears on the face of the record, we overrule both of the points of error raised in petitioner’s brief and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The question before us is whether there is á lack of jurisdiction apparent on the face of the record. Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Sup. Co., 690 S.W.2d 884, 884 (Tex.1985); McKanna v. Edgar,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Nrtrx Corp. v. StoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pleasant Homes, Inc. v. Allied Bank of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Turbo Restaurants, LLC v. Reid's Refrigeration Inc. D/B/A Reid's A/C & Heat, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API