Legal Opinion

Pleasant Homes, Inc. v. Allied Bank of Dallas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1989No. C-8100PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The application for writ of error of petitioners, Pleasant Homes, Inc. and Ray J. Stockman, is denied, as the default judgment was properly reversed on other grounds. In so doing, however, the majority of the court disapproves of the court of appeals’ conclusion that a default judgment against a bank could not stand because the record on appeal did not affirmatively show that the individual at the bank, who was served with process in accordance with Texas Revised Civil Statutes article 342-915 (1989), was in fact the bank’s vice-president, cashier, or agent for service. 757 S.W.2d 460, 462-63.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allied Bank of Dallas v. Pleasant Homes, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  2. Nrtrx Corp. v. StoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Dentex Shoe Corp. v. F.E. Schmitz Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Langdale v. VillamilCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. City of Dallas v. Cox, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  4. Hercules Concrete Pumping Service, Inc. v. Bencon Management & General Contracting Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  5. Harvestons Securities, Inc. v. Narnia Investments, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API