Legal Opinion

Metzker v. Slocum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1975PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff, a minor child, brought this negligence action for damages for legal malpractice through her guardian ad litem. Plaintiff appeals from an order of dismissal after refusing to plead further when a demurrer was sustained to her complaint.

In substance, plaintiff’s complaint alleges that defendant was retained by Velma and William Metzker, then husband and wife, to perfect an adoption of plaintiff. Defendant thereafter negligently failed to perfect the adoption, unbeknown to the Metzkers. Approximately ten years later Velma and William Metzker were legally separated but, because no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Buckley v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Scholler v. SchollerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Simon v. ZippersteinOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Nix v. SawyerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API