Legal Opinion

People v. Kersey

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1957No. Crim. 5866PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Having been convicted of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245), appellant demands a reversal on the grounds of (1) insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment, (2) prejudice suffered by reason of insulting questions propounded by the prosecuting attorney.

The genesis of the crime lay in the innocent act of one Hardy who had purchased at a snack shop two cups of coffee for himself and one James Polk and laid one dollar on the counter. While they were enjoying their réfreshment, Hardy was called away to speak with Mr. Vernon who sat nearby in his automobile. Appellant, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. People v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. People v. McCraskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. VillagrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. O'FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. HerdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API