Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Overstreet

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1898PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from, the District Gourt of Cleveland County; before J. R. Keaton, District Judge. Action by T. J. Overstreet against E. J. Hawkins. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

TaesNey, J.:

The principal assignment of error discussed in the briefs and relied upon by counsel for plaintiff in error is that the court erred in overruling a demurrer to the amended petition and reply taken together, and in overruling a motion for judgment on the pleading. The petition alleged that on August 28, 1895, the plaintiff was the owner of a general stock of merchandise in the city of Norman; that on said day defendant took possession of said stock of merchandise with-, out the consent and against the will of the plaintiff, and converted and disposed of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. MosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Page v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Turben v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Kee v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Branson v. BransonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  5. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API