Legal Opinion
Costen v. Pauline's Sportswear, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 21, 1968No. 21387PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, plaintiffs below, challenge the District Court’s dismissal of their original complaint and of their amended complaint. The original complaint consists of twelve counts, each appellant1 being covered by three counts. The amended complaint consists of eight counts, in groups of two counts for each appellant. In both complaints there is no substantial difference in the allegations relating to each appellant. Thus, for convenience, the following discussion of the factual situation as alleged in the complaints will be confined to the first group of counts in each…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- S & S Logging Co. v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Scovill Manufacturing Co. v. Skaggs Pay Less Drug StoresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Albert A. Bales v. The Kansas City Star Company, Gustav H. Hauser v. The Kansas City Star CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Lehmann Trading Corporation v. J & H STOLOW, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stein v. United Artists Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Dale v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Townsend v. Columbia OperationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Lodge 1380 v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Costen v. Pauline's SportswearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.