Legal Opinion
State v. Zenquis
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 29, 1991PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
251 N.J. Super. 358 (1991)
598 A.2d 245
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
LUIS D. ZENQUIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 8, 1991.
Decided October 29, 1991.
Before Judges ANTELL, LONG and BAIME.
Steven J. Fram, designated counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Wilfredo Caraballo, Public Defender, attorney; Steven J. Fram of counsel and on the brief).
Mark E. Bailey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Mark E. Bailey of counsel and on the letter-brief).
The opinion of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ReeveyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Shuttleworth v. City of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- State v. DreherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- State v. Samander S. Dabas (069498)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.