Legal Opinion

State v. Samander S. Dabas (069498)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 30, 2013No. A-109-11PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

Defendant Samander Dabas was convicted of the murder of his wife based largely on statements he made to prosecutor’s investigators in the early morning hours of August 25, 2004. An investigator’s purposeful destruction of his notes taken during two hours of Dabas’s interrogation is at the heart of the appeal before us.

After Dabas’s arrest, Investigator John Dando of the Middlesex County Prosecutor’s Office conducted a two-hour “pre-interview” during which he asked Dabas open-ended questions and recorded, in handwritten notes, Dabas’s answers. Then, Investigator Dan-do—using his interview…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. State v. GandhiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Stephanie Washington v. Carlos Perez, Olympia Trails & Olympia Trails Bus Company (072522)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. State of New Jersey v. Scott RobertsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  3. KRISTY BOWSER VS. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM (POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  4. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  5. State v. Daryel Rawls (072388)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API