Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Schaltenbrand v. City of Knoxville

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 12, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FARMER, Judge.

This is the consolidated appeal of five quo warranto actions which were dismissed for mootness.

On March 24,1987, six ordinances annexing different areas contiguous to the City of Knoxville were passed by the City Coun*813cil on final reading. The following day, these suits were brought pursuant to T.C.A. § 6-51-103 challenging the reasonableness of three of the ordinances. Those ordinances were repealed by the City of Knoxville by ordinances passed on May 17, 1988 and August 25, 1988. Subsequently, the Chancellor dismissed each of these quo warranto actions as moot. Each plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. KING v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Billington v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  3. Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. City of Bluff City v. MorrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Besso v. Town of PorterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sons of Confederate Veterans Nathan Bedford Forrest Camp 215 v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API