Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tabak v. Steele

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 9, 2005Published

1DissentSuarez, P.J.

I respectfully dissent. The issue on *81this appeal is whether landlords established at trial that tenant Martha Steele did not maintain an ongoing, substantial physical nexus to the subject apartment for actual living purposes. I find that landlords met their burden, that Steele failed to refute landlords’ evidence and that a final judgment of possession should be awarded in favor of the petitioners.

Contrary to the position advanced by the majority, a fair interpretation of the evidence establishes that Steele did not primarily reside at the subject East 12th Street, Manhattan, apartment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Universal Leasing Services, Inc. v. Flushing Hae Kwan RestaurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Emay Properties Corp. v. NortonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1987
  3. Briar Hill Apartments Co. v. TepermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. 23 Jones Street Associates v. Keebler-BerettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Berwick Land Corp. v. MucelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API