Tabak v. Steele
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1DissentSuarez, P.J.
I respectfully dissent. The issue on *81this appeal is whether landlords established at trial that tenant Martha Steele did not maintain an ongoing, substantial physical nexus to the subject apartment for actual living purposes. I find that landlords met their burden, that Steele failed to refute landlords’ evidence and that a final judgment of possession should be awarded in favor of the petitioners.
Contrary to the position advanced by the majority, a fair interpretation of the evidence establishes that Steele did not primarily reside at the subject East 12th Street, Manhattan, apartment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Universal Leasing Services, Inc. v. Flushing Hae Kwan RestaurantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Emay Properties Corp. v. NortonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1987
- Briar Hill Apartments Co. v. TepermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- 23 Jones Street Associates v. Keebler-BerettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Berwick Land Corp. v. MucelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.