Legal Opinion

Michigan Trust Co. v. Otero Irrigation District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 5, 1925No. 10,851PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Our General Assembly has provided for the organization of irrigation districts in a statute substantially the same as the so-called Wright Act of the state of California. In 1905, (S. L. 1905, p. 270; C. L. 1921, p. 679, § 2033, et seq.) it passed an act for the dissolution of districts so organized, when they are free from debt, and in 1915, (S. L. 1915, p. 307; C. L. 1921, p. 680, § 2035 et seq.) another act for dissolving irrigation districts generally, both those which are, and those which are not, indebted. The decree dissolving the Otero Irrigation District, now before us, was rendered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boynton v. District TownshipSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  2. Heath v. Green City Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. Alpha Corp. v. Denver-Greeley Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  4. Carter v. Badger Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Dalton v. Otero Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API