Legal Opinion

Gilyard v. South Carolina Department of Youth Services

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided September 5, 1985No. Civ. A. 3:84-992-15PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAMILTON, District Judge.

The present action arises under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The plaintiff herein, a former principal at the Reception and Evaluation Center School (hereinafter the “R & E School”) contends that when the R & E School was merged with Willow Lane Junior High School (hereinafter “Willow Lane”), he was denied the position of principal of the merged schools on account of his race. The plaintiff also contends that the merger itself was accomplished for the racially discriminatory purpose of ousting him. The matter is…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graham v. Texasgulf, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
  2. Hon v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Glover v. Lockheed Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1991
  4. Davis v. Target Stores Division of Dayton Hudson Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API