Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Iowa v. Jesus Angel Ramirez

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 25, 2017No. 15–1807Published

1DissentWiggins, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The court should have suppressed the evidence obtained in Iowa for use in an Iowa court.

The majority bases its opinion on cases that subscribe to the reverse silver-platter doctrine. The majority finds these cases persuasive. However, in finding these cases persuasive, the majority fails to examine the underpinnings of the silver-platter doctrine as originally established and abandoned by the federal courts. The majority also fails to reconcile its position with the reasons why we apply the exclusionary rule in Iowa. In Iowa, we should not decide an issue by color…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API