Legal Opinion

Howell v. Thompson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1992No. D-2425PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The court of appeals’ issuance of its opinion and judgment was void because it occurred after petitioner filed bankruptcy proceedings and during the pendency of the automatic stay provided by 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp., 751 S.W.2d 499, 501 (Tex.1988). It is therefore ordered that petitioner’s application for writ of error is granted, the judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. Tex.R.App.P. 170. This order does not preclude reis-suance of the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental Casing Corp. v. Samedan Oil Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  2. Black v. ShorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Darr v. Altman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  4. Sanchez v. Hester, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
  5. Paine v. Sealey, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API