Legal Opinion

Paine v. Sealey

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided November 20, 1997No. 14-95-00382-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEE, Justice.

Plexus Information Network, Inc. [Plexus] and Stephen B. Paine [Paine] appeal an order granting summary judgment in favor of Forrest Sealey, Greg Copeland, and Robert Gruden [appellees]. Appellees sued Plexus for breach of contract and fraud, and filed suit against Paine, Plexus’s president and sole shareholder, in an effort to pierce the corporate veil. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees based solely on unanswered requests for admissions. In four points of error, Plexus and Paine contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. We…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Goswami v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Texas-Ohio Gas, Inc. v. Mecom, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  2. Darr v. Altman, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Elbar Investments, Inc. v. Pierce (In Re Pierce)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
  4. In Re Helena Chemical Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Bustamante v. Cueva (In Re Cueva)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API