Legal Opinion

Elizabeth Sebesta v. Andrea Davis

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 21, 2017No. 16-1355PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Chief Judge.

A parent has a fundamental right, protected by the Constitution, to “direct the upbringing” of her child. See Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534-35, 45 S.Ct. 571, 69 L.Ed. 1070 (1925); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923). But like many constitutional rights, this one does not exist in a vacuum. The state has a strong interest in its most vulnerable citizens, including its children. In order to protect their welfare, states have agencies devoted to the task of child and family protection. Those agencies are staffed by people…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Natia Sampson v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Rivera v. GuevaraDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Michelle Gilbank v. Wood County Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  4. Nathson Fields v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. Erika Mabes v. Shannon ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API