Commonwealth v. Weik
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for maintaining a slot machine for gambling purposes, 18 Pa.C. S.A. § 5513(a)(1). Appellant contends that the lower court erred in refusing to suppress evidence seized by police following a warrantless entry into a building on his property. We agree and, accordingly, vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.
Appellant was charged with maintaining a slot machine for gambling purposes, in violation of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5513(a)(1). Prior to trial, appellant moved to suppress the slot machine that was seized pursuant to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. MilyakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. CarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.