Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Weik

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1987No. 00478 HBG 86PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for maintaining a slot machine for gambling purposes, 18 Pa.C. S.A. § 5513(a)(1). Appellant contends that the lower court erred in refusing to suppress evidence seized by police following a warrantless entry into a building on his property. We agree and, accordingly, vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.

Appellant was charged with maintaining a slot machine for gambling purposes, in violation of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5513(a)(1). Prior to trial, appellant moved to suppress the slot machine that was seized pursuant to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. MilyakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BostickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. CarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API